|No longer are drawings considered mere preparatory drafts for a future artwork—they’ve come to be their own envisioned entities and usually bear quite interesting art theories.
As an art lover and a poet, I practice ekphrasis. Simply, ekphrasis poetry are poems inspired by another art form—in my case, the visual arts. So I've written a number of poems about admired if not beloved paintings, sculptures, drawings, installations and other types of visual art.
However, I've written more based on the visual arts process—or my perception of the process—rather than a specific art work. For example, an entire book—my first U.S.-published collection, Reproductions of the Empty Flagpole (Marsh Hawk Press, 1998)—was inspired by, as well as explored my imagined offshoots of, abstract expressionism. Most of the poems in that book do not refer to a specific abstract expressionist work but, instead, engage the approaches of abstraction and expressionism.
An approach, however, is not necessarily visual—a painting is visual, but not necessarily the process that created it. My focus was on the process of making, which encompasses the underlying philosophies to what generates a particular artwork. My thrill over the process itself—regardless at times of the outcome—is one reason why I am also inspired by conceptual art. Actually, beyond those works that others would categorize as "conceptual art," I am generally interested in any art work's conceptual underpinning.
In relatively recent times, some of the most interesting art-making philosophies and strategies have surfaced from the world of drawing. No longer are drawings considered mere preparatory drafts for a future artwork—they’ve come to be their own envisioned entities and usually bear quite interesting art theories. The cover to my first book, BLACK LIGHTNING (Asian American Writers Workshop/Temple University Press, 1998) reflects a canvas “by” Theresa Chong who basically allowed gravity to draw the resulting image; that is, a wet black canvas was tilted vertically so that the dollops of white paint on top of the canvas then fell down linearly but also fragmentally down the black backdrop depending on how the black and white paint gravitated (pun intended) to each other. By being “by” gravity as much as Theresa, the work partly reveals a concern over the instability of identity (in turn, a not irrelevant concern to artists of color).
BLACK LIGHTNING by Theresa Chong
Other contemporary masters of drawing—Maureen McQuillan, Eve Aschheim, Andrew Bicks, James Westwater, among others—enliven my life with not just their artworks but (my perception of) their philosophies and concepts that birthed them. With my interest, thus, in the art-making process and not just the artwork, I immediately adored the haptic drawings created by Filipina-American poet-artist-critic-editor Jean Vengua. Introduced to haptic drawings by the works of San Francisco-based poet/visual artist Stephen Vincent, I would come to be fascinated by Jean’s own creations. It is also through Jean that I’ve come to take a closer look at the conceptual underpinnings to haptic drawings.
Jean creates her haptic drawings as she is engaged with something else—often music and other types of sounds, e.g. when someone reads poetry out loud to her or nature sounds emanating from animal and bird activities in her yard. While she often draws to sound, she can also draw to non audio events, e.g. a David Bowie video and a theater performance.
Here is a haptic that was drawn to the Beatles song, “Dear Prudence,” as vocalized in the soundtrack for “Across the Universe.” About her process, Jean says, “Here I used colored pencils on white paper. My hands tend to apply more pressure on the downbeat when I’m listening to rock. For the first time I tried using my left hand. It’s so unused to holding a pencil and writing or drawing that my fingers started to cramp up within a minute to two.” It’s significant that Jean notes the physical effects of the process because of the bodily involvement inherent in haptic drawings (see more on this below):
The sound with which Jean engages to make her drawings need not emanate from a single source. Here is a drawing drawn to several soundtracks, one after another. In color, using Prang felt tip brushes, Jean drew to (1) Noriko Matsueda (piano), “Bevelle’s Secrets” in Final Fantasy X-2; (2) Astral Projection, “The Feelings”; and (3) Clint Mansell “We Got the Gun.” She followed up in white Gello Pen drawing to Tomoyasu Hotel, “Howling.”
Several Soundtracks Haptic
And the sound need not come from music. Here is an example inspired by crickets; as regards her process, Jean says, “It’s summery warm here (the beginning of fire season in California), and with all the windows open this evening, we can hear the crickets. So this piece was drawn to the sound of the crickets, using my Waterman fountain pen. The sound inspired an intricate little line going up/down up/down. Occasionally I heard a frog. At some point a different chirping sound entered the scene. I suspect it was just a cricket with an idiosyncratic style—or perhaps it was the female cricket’s response. It was less intricate-chirpy, and more direct. // Honestly, drawing to these crickets could drive me a little mad, because it’s just the same thing over and over. I tried to get into meditative mode, but it didn’t sink in. Besides, my fingers were starting to cramp. Nevertheless, it was an interesting little exercise.”
And here is a drawing made to the sounds of various animals; Jean says, “Drawn to birdsong and other sounds (goats, chickens, crickets, dogs) coming from the field in front of my house at around twilight. I used my lovely ‘exploded tip’ Prang brush pen again, which was making some interesting little double line marks. I like the way the lines form a kind of ‘landscape’ across the page. The cluster of dark marks in the upper right-hand side of the paper is a response to a riot of Pugs yapping their heads off (my neighbor down in the glen has 6 Pugs). Once again, doing haptics, I notice bird songs I never heard. It’s as if I never really listened before…”
Nor is it just sounds that inspire Jean’s haptic drawings. Theoretically, anything in her environment—with which she chooses to engage—can inspire a drawing. Here is a drawing created as she watched a multi-media theater performance by Filipina-American artist Aimee Suzara. About her process, Jean says, “In some ways, white gel pen on black is my media of choice if I’m sitting in a darkened theater, because I can see the white on black better. This was drawn while watching a performance, ‘A History of the Body’ by Aimee Suzara (http://aimeesuzara.net/words-work/current-projects/). My arm/hands (lines) moved to the movements and sounds of the actors (who also danced), the inflections of their voices, and also to the ambient soundtrack.”
Aimee Suzara Haptic
While I appreciate the visual outcomes of Jean’s drawings, I as much appreciate the conceptual underpinnings to her approach. As I indicated, I empathized with her art because I thought her creative process allows her to transcend the individual ego or the limits of imagination. While, in ekphrasis, I used art—rather than something I would concoct or imagine—as the start of creation, Jean uses external elements (sounds or activities of others) to do the same. But while there are similarities to our approaches, there are also critical differences. A major focus by Jean is the role of the body. Jean is currently writing a book about her haptic drawing process and this is what she says in that book (I was privileged to see early drafts):
Haptic drawing, as I use the term, is a meditative and contemplative practice, in which awareness of the body and empathic awareness of the object of the drawing are integral. The “haptic” process uses the “whole” experience—interior and exterior—as a “touchstone” to the drawing experience. “Haptic” is often related to “touch” therapy, where healing and creativity occurs through empathic touch. While we may not necessarily touch the object we are drawing, we can sensitize ourselves (through the various senses) to the object. In awareness of the drawn object and our own subjective experience (thoughts, emotions, body feelings), the body translates it all through our hands and onto lines on paper.
It’s noteworthy that (a draft of) the introductory essay in her forthcoming book bears the following epigraph:
"pertaining to the sense of touch," 1890, from Greek haptikos "able to come into contact with," from haptein "to fasten." Online Etymology Dictionary.
Basically, Jean’s approach belies much of the received wisdom from certain philosophers and theorists of visual arts who would seek to separate the mind from the body. In her blog of haptic drawings, Jean acknowledges the insight of textile artist Catherine Dormor’s thesis, “Material Matrices: haptic, scopic, and textile.” Here’s an excerpt:
Aristotle, in De Anima (c.350BC) established a hierarchy of the senses which positioned sight as the superior sense and touch as the most ‘bestial’ and thus at the bottom. Such a hierarchy effectively sets up a system of and for perceiving whereby that which is seen supersedes that which is felt or touched in terms of truth–knowing. In his statement ‘I think, therefore I am’ René Descartes (1637, part IV) separates mind from body and prioritises the mind within that relationship. By extension, then, the abstract becomes prioritised over matter and sight over touch, an occularcentric mode of thought and language that stems from European post–Enlightenment discourses and one that has been traditionally perpetuated by philosophers and theorists of visual culture.
Jean notes that there are certain implications—the way I read her, even certain responsibilities—to the haptic approach. While the artist plays a role in the creative process, Jean is emphatic that her haptic approach is not “necessarily about finding the ‘true artist’ in you, or reaching down inside to find some essential creative stream within—‘your passion,’ or ‘your bliss’.” Jean’s focus—which she explains in a section she titles “The Politics of Drawing: A Manifesto”—is “about cultivating and engaging your curiosity and empathy for the world, its inhabitants, and phenomena. It’s about allowing your body to interpret the world you live in.”
As a result, as Jean says in her essay, “The point is not to produce a stunning work of line art.” The point, Jean says, is
to increase awareness of the body, its creative, aesthetic, nervous and energetic dimensions and impulses, and the relationship of yourself to inner and outer worlds. As the drawings emerge, so may recurring lineal gestures and symbols--threads from which to record knowing, or to draw meaning, personal and communal, the stuff of storytelling and myth.
With the goal not being the material (or commercial) object of the drawing, it’s no coincidence that Jean rarely edits or reworks a haptic drawing—a drawing is “finished” as soon as its particular drawing process ends. (She does make an exception if she thinks a drawing might become a series, causing her to “play around with it to see what else I can do with it.”)
Jean’s philosophy—and despite the attractive results of her approach as exemplified in the above reproductions—made me think of the phrase “post-visual.” I thought of that phrase because Jean’s goal is not the drawing itself. The more important impetus here would seem to be “the relationship of yourself to inner and outer worlds.” Drawings—just like poetry, story-telling and other activities—then becomes just a way to better understand one’s history, culture and environment. And not understand it in a purely abstract way, given the very personal involvement of one’s body. Drawing becomes a path for expanding the expanse of one’s empathy.
Isn’t such an impetus, therefore, creating a means for one to form healthier relationships with others, nature and other aspects of one’s environment, and even intellectual or academic pursuits? Isn’t the goal then to be a better person as well as a better citizen of the world? And wouldn’t such a result be one of the best validations of the importance of art?
Here’s one more example of Jean’s haptic drawings. This one was drawn as she listened to “playful banter behind the counter by baristas in a local book cafe. Just for fun I dropped in a few words from the conversation. The discussion covered simple syrups, espresso foam, language issues with customers, and recipes.”